1
00:00:05,829 --> 00:00:03,030
i hope everybody is having a great

2
00:00:07,749 --> 00:00:05,839
sunday and i just wanted to do a really

3
00:00:10,390 --> 00:00:07,759
quick update on that new york times

4
00:00:12,789 --> 00:00:10,400
article by julian barnes

5
00:00:14,230 --> 00:00:12,799
daniel miller on twitter pointed out to

6
00:00:16,150 --> 00:00:14,240
me that

7
00:00:18,310 --> 00:00:16,160
the original article which was published

8
00:00:21,189 --> 00:00:18,320
on the 24th

9
00:00:23,109 --> 00:00:21,199
was updated and changed on the 25th i

10
00:00:24,950 --> 00:00:23,119
had seen the update but

11
00:00:27,509 --> 00:00:24,960
i saw the note that it was updated but i

12
00:00:30,070 --> 00:00:27,519
didn't realize it was updated as much as

13
00:00:31,830 --> 00:00:30,080
it was so thanks to danny for that and

14
00:00:33,190 --> 00:00:31,840
i'll just point out the difference

15
00:00:35,350 --> 00:00:33,200
between the two

16
00:00:38,229 --> 00:00:35,360
what was taken out and what was added

17
00:00:41,990 --> 00:00:38,239
really quick and on the right is you can

18
00:00:44,869 --> 00:00:42,000
see the november 20 november 24th

19
00:00:47,750 --> 00:00:44,879
updated ver november 25th updated

20
00:00:48,709 --> 00:00:47,760
version is on the right

21
00:00:50,150 --> 00:00:48,719
and

22
00:00:51,990 --> 00:00:50,160
i just want to say i'm going to queue it

23
00:00:54,069 --> 00:00:52,000
up to the same spot

24
00:00:55,990 --> 00:00:54,079
as the one on the left the 24th i just

25
00:00:58,549 --> 00:00:56,000
want to say that um

26
00:01:01,029 --> 00:00:58,559
articles are updated all the time

27
00:01:02,069 --> 00:01:01,039
so i'm not necessarily saying

28
00:01:04,950 --> 00:01:02,079
somebody

29
00:01:08,469 --> 00:01:04,960
in the dod or the world of intelligence

30
00:01:12,550 --> 00:01:10,550
barnes and said you need to update your

31
00:01:14,390 --> 00:01:12,560
article because you need to put this in

32
00:01:16,310 --> 00:01:14,400
there and take this out i'm not saying

33
00:01:18,390 --> 00:01:16,320
that happened because updated updates

34
00:01:20,710 --> 00:01:18,400
happen all the time but i just wanted to

35
00:01:21,990 --> 00:01:20,720
know wanted to note

36
00:01:23,590 --> 00:01:22,000
the differences

37
00:01:25,910 --> 00:01:23,600
so

38
00:01:28,469 --> 00:01:25,920
started out on the 24th thanks to the

39
00:01:30,630 --> 00:01:28,479
wayback machine which takes

40
00:01:32,789 --> 00:01:30,640
snapshots of articles so you can check

41
00:01:35,030 --> 00:01:32,799
and see what was actually edited

42
00:01:37,510 --> 00:01:35,040
it takes snapshots of snapshots of web

43
00:01:39,510 --> 00:01:37,520
pages and in this case an article so

44
00:01:40,950 --> 00:01:39,520
it's a great tool to have

45
00:01:42,710 --> 00:01:40,960
when somebody makes a change and you

46
00:01:45,510 --> 00:01:42,720
want to see what was changed

47
00:01:47,910 --> 00:01:45,520
so we start out

48
00:01:50,149 --> 00:01:47,920
some people believe and i'm reading from

49
00:01:53,270 --> 00:01:50,159
the left one the 24th

50
00:01:55,190 --> 00:01:53,280
some people believe any phenomenon

51
00:01:57,510 --> 00:01:55,200
exhibiting technology beyond the

52
00:01:59,109 --> 00:01:57,520
abilities of the united states needs

53
00:02:01,749 --> 00:01:59,119
deep study

54
00:02:04,389 --> 00:02:01,759
skeptics believe most or all of the

55
00:02:06,950 --> 00:02:04,399
sightings including videos recorded by

56
00:02:09,430 --> 00:02:06,960
cameras on military fighter jets can be

57
00:02:11,670 --> 00:02:09,440
explained by tricks of optics or

58
00:02:14,070 --> 00:02:11,680
naturally occurring phenomena

59
00:02:15,589 --> 00:02:14,080
the second paragraph

60
00:02:18,229 --> 00:02:15,599
but the military research that

61
00:02:20,470 --> 00:02:18,239
underpinned the intelligence report

62
00:02:22,790 --> 00:02:20,480
did little to address those theories or

63
00:02:24,630 --> 00:02:22,800
provide specific explanations for

64
00:02:27,430 --> 00:02:24,640
various sightings that have captured the

65
00:02:29,830 --> 00:02:27,440
public's imagination

66
00:02:32,630 --> 00:02:29,840
that paragraph was taken out

67
00:02:34,550 --> 00:02:32,640
and it is it is not in the version that

68
00:02:36,630 --> 00:02:34,560
was published on the 25th that was

69
00:02:37,990 --> 00:02:36,640
updated on the 25th as you can see on

70
00:02:41,110 --> 00:02:38,000
the right

71
00:02:44,150 --> 00:02:41,120
from that now

72
00:02:46,470 --> 00:02:44,160
that was taken out and what was added is

73
00:02:50,470 --> 00:02:48,869
i'm reading from the right side the 25th

74
00:02:51,750 --> 00:02:50,480
this is the new york times updated

75
00:02:53,430 --> 00:02:51,760
version

76
00:02:56,309 --> 00:02:53,440
earlier this month

77
00:02:57,509 --> 00:02:56,319
avril d haynes the director of national

78
00:02:59,350 --> 00:02:57,519
intelligence

79
00:03:02,229 --> 00:02:59,360
said the government needed to get better

80
00:03:04,550 --> 00:03:02,239
at collecting information about the

81
00:03:06,630 --> 00:03:04,560
unexplained phenomenon

82
00:03:09,350 --> 00:03:06,640
ms haynes said that the primary focus

83
00:03:11,830 --> 00:03:09,360
remained on whether the phenomenon were

84
00:03:13,910 --> 00:03:11,840
aircraft from rival nations spying on

85
00:03:16,710 --> 00:03:13,920
the united states

86
00:03:20,149 --> 00:03:16,720
but held open the possibility

87
00:03:22,949 --> 00:03:20,159
of otherworldly explanations

88
00:03:24,949 --> 00:03:22,959
and if you watch my first video

89
00:03:26,470 --> 00:03:24,959
i played video of her

90
00:03:29,190 --> 00:03:26,480
talking

91
00:03:33,190 --> 00:03:29,200
about uap and it included that it

92
00:03:35,990 --> 00:03:33,200
included that quote among other quotes

93
00:03:38,949 --> 00:03:36,000
it goes on quoting haines

94
00:03:41,509 --> 00:03:38,959
the main issues that congress and others

95
00:03:44,630 --> 00:03:41,519
have been concerned about are basically

96
00:03:47,350 --> 00:03:44,640
safety of flight concerns

97
00:03:48,149 --> 00:03:47,360
and the counterintelligence issues she

98
00:03:49,750 --> 00:03:48,159
said

99
00:03:51,589 --> 00:03:49,760
but of course there's always the

100
00:03:54,630 --> 00:03:51,599
question of is there something else that

101
00:03:58,550 --> 00:03:54,640
we simply do not understand that might

102
00:04:02,229 --> 00:04:00,229
and i even struggled to say that word

103
00:04:04,070 --> 00:04:02,239
like she did when she was at the live

104
00:04:07,270 --> 00:04:04,080
event at the national cathedral a couple

105
00:04:12,630 --> 00:04:09,910
so that was added and then

106
00:04:16,949 --> 00:04:14,789
barnes says miss haines's

107
00:04:19,349 --> 00:04:16,959
extraterrestrial remark and that once

108
00:04:21,830 --> 00:04:19,359
again this was not in the original

109
00:04:23,909 --> 00:04:21,840
her remark was not necessarily referring

110
00:04:27,510 --> 00:04:23,919
to space aliens but rather more

111
00:04:29,749 --> 00:04:27,520
pedestrian explanations such as meteors

112
00:04:33,350 --> 00:04:29,759
and solar flares that could impact

113
00:04:38,390 --> 00:04:35,909
so those three paragraphs were added and

114
00:04:40,390 --> 00:04:38,400
obviously as i said in the first video

115
00:04:42,870 --> 00:04:40,400
you cannot be serious it's it's

116
00:04:44,710 --> 00:04:42,880
ridiculous to even think

117
00:04:47,830 --> 00:04:44,720
she was that she was referring to

118
00:04:49,350 --> 00:04:47,840
meteors and solar flares i mean she even

119
00:04:53,909 --> 00:04:49,360
said

120
00:04:57,950 --> 00:04:55,909
is there something else we simply do not

121
00:04:59,590 --> 00:04:57,960
understand that might come

122
00:05:01,189 --> 00:04:59,600
extraterrestrially

123
00:05:04,150 --> 00:05:01,199
what don't we understand about meteors

124
00:05:06,150 --> 00:05:04,160
or solar flares and um i'm stealing that

125
00:05:08,150 --> 00:05:06,160
for from twitter and i'll i'll i'll give

126
00:05:11,110 --> 00:05:08,160
that person credit in a second

127
00:05:13,510 --> 00:05:11,120
obviously we were i mean our our

128
00:05:16,870 --> 00:05:13,520
aircraft our f-18 pilots are not

129
00:05:19,110 --> 00:05:16,880
encountering solar flares and meteors

130
00:05:21,270 --> 00:05:19,120
and thinking they're unknown objects you

131
00:05:23,430 --> 00:05:21,280
know it's ridiculous

132
00:05:24,390 --> 00:05:23,440
so

133
00:05:26,310 --> 00:05:24,400
did he get

134
00:05:28,790 --> 00:05:26,320
this one of three options there did he

135
00:05:30,469 --> 00:05:28,800
get that you know he's not quoting

136
00:05:32,870 --> 00:05:30,479
specifically so is he paraphrasing

137
00:05:35,029 --> 00:05:32,880
somebody is he paraphrasing a source he

138
00:05:37,430 --> 00:05:35,039
spoke with did he go back to haines and

139
00:05:38,469 --> 00:05:37,440
ask her to clarify or is he offering an

140
00:05:40,390 --> 00:05:38,479
opinion

141
00:05:42,310 --> 00:05:40,400
those are all problematic because he

142
00:05:43,749 --> 00:05:42,320
doesn't clarify he doesn't clarify where

143
00:05:46,310 --> 00:05:43,759
that information is coming from and if

144
00:05:49,110 --> 00:05:46,320
it is his opinion this is not an op-ed

145
00:05:50,710 --> 00:05:49,120
this is not an opinion piece so

146
00:05:52,469 --> 00:05:50,720
he should not be giving his opinion so

147
00:05:54,870 --> 00:05:52,479
hopefully he will weigh in at some point

148
00:05:57,189 --> 00:05:54,880
on twitter and say oh yeah i got this

149
00:05:59,270 --> 00:05:57,199
information from x and y

150
00:06:01,110 --> 00:05:59,280
but so far he has not done that and it's

151
00:06:03,510 --> 00:06:01,120
really it really stands out as

152
00:06:06,309 --> 00:06:03,520
problematic for this article especially

153
00:06:08,710 --> 00:06:06,319
the new york times you know

154
00:06:11,350 --> 00:06:08,720
maybe we'll find out um

155
00:06:13,430 --> 00:06:11,360
so originally as i said

156
00:06:14,629 --> 00:06:13,440
this came from it was pointed out to me

157
00:06:19,270 --> 00:06:14,639
by

158
00:06:24,309 --> 00:06:22,390
and danny does great work and i'm glad

159
00:06:25,590 --> 00:06:24,319
he pointed this out and i could go back

160
00:06:28,390 --> 00:06:25,600
and look it up

161
00:06:32,070 --> 00:06:30,390
the other quote i was talking about is

162
00:06:34,230 --> 00:06:32,080
pointing out that we simply do not

163
00:06:35,909 --> 00:06:34,240
understand what we're seeing obviously

164
00:06:37,749 --> 00:06:35,919
that's from omega point a great guy

165
00:06:40,309 --> 00:06:37,759
friend of mine um

166
00:06:42,230 --> 00:06:40,319
he was on a recent live stream with me

167
00:06:45,510 --> 00:06:42,240
another another very

168
00:06:47,189 --> 00:06:45,520
very informed person and yes what don't

169
00:06:49,430 --> 00:06:47,199
we understand about meteors and solar

170
00:06:50,870 --> 00:06:49,440
flares at this point it's so ridiculous

171
00:06:53,430 --> 00:06:50,880
so anyway

172
00:06:55,110 --> 00:06:53,440
that's the update and

173
00:06:56,790 --> 00:06:55,120
i appreciate you guys watching i know a

174
00:06:59,029 --> 00:06:56,800
lot of people are not on twitter and i

175
00:07:00,550 --> 00:06:59,039
always forget that so

176
00:07:02,469 --> 00:07:00,560
it's

177
00:07:04,309 --> 00:07:02,479
it would be great if everybody was on

178
00:07:06,070 --> 00:07:04,319
twitter and i could just focus there but

179
00:07:08,550 --> 00:07:06,080
i know that's not realistic so i will

180
00:07:11,189 --> 00:07:08,560
try as my i will try my best i can't

181
00:07:13,510 --> 00:07:11,199
duplicate everything i do on twitter

182
00:07:14,950 --> 00:07:13,520
on youtube what i can try to do and i've

183
00:07:17,270 --> 00:07:14,960
mentioned this before but i have not

184
00:07:19,350 --> 00:07:17,280
followed up is i could just

185
00:07:21,029 --> 00:07:19,360
i could just do a video and just go to

186
00:07:22,469 --> 00:07:21,039
my twitter and just

187
00:07:24,469 --> 00:07:22,479
like this i can just go to my twitter

188
00:07:26,390 --> 00:07:24,479
and just you know go through all of my

189
00:07:27,670 --> 00:07:26,400
tweets and i can i could tell you what i

190
00:07:29,749 --> 00:07:27,680
was thinking

191
00:07:31,670 --> 00:07:29,759
when i tweeted and that's

192
00:07:33,270 --> 00:07:31,680
right there is my video that i that you

193
00:07:34,629 --> 00:07:33,280
guys have already seen or some of you

194
00:07:36,230 --> 00:07:34,639
have seen

195
00:07:38,390 --> 00:07:36,240
and i could just go through some of my

196
00:07:39,990 --> 00:07:38,400
retweets why i retweeted

197
00:07:40,790 --> 00:07:40,000
from other people

198
00:07:42,629 --> 00:07:40,800
and

199
00:07:45,430 --> 00:07:42,639
you know

200
00:07:48,869 --> 00:07:45,440
that i could do that for an hour a week

201
00:07:52,150 --> 00:07:48,879
maybe two hours and then take questions

202
00:07:53,589 --> 00:07:52,160
it's just it's a hard balance between

203
00:07:56,469 --> 00:07:53,599
trying to do the blog which i'm still

204
00:07:59,029 --> 00:07:56,479
working on transcripts um

205
00:08:00,070 --> 00:07:59,039
my youtube and also twitter there's not

206
00:08:01,510 --> 00:08:00,080
i don't think there are a lot of people

207
00:08:04,550 --> 00:08:01,520
that do twitter

208
00:08:07,110 --> 00:08:04,560
as much as i do and also do a blog and

209
00:08:09,510 --> 00:08:07,120
also try to do youtube um

210
00:08:13,749 --> 00:08:09,520
so i'm trying and i appreciate the

211
00:08:15,830 --> 00:08:13,759
feedback and comments especially

212
00:08:17,110 --> 00:08:15,840
tell me that you watched it because

213
00:08:18,629 --> 00:08:17,120
when you take time to do something and

214
00:08:19,430 --> 00:08:18,639
then people don't watch or listen or

215
00:08:21,189 --> 00:08:19,440
read

216
00:08:22,950 --> 00:08:21,199
you know it's a little deflating

217
00:08:24,869 --> 00:08:22,960
uh but

218
00:08:26,869 --> 00:08:24,879
i wanted to do this i wanted to do this

219
00:08:29,189 --> 00:08:26,879
update today so

220
00:08:30,950 --> 00:08:29,199
not too long and uh

221
00:08:32,630 --> 00:08:30,960
like i said

222
00:08:34,709 --> 00:08:32,640
this doesn't prove that anybody was

223
00:08:36,870 --> 00:08:34,719
telling julian barnes

224
00:08:39,190 --> 00:08:36,880
to change his article

225
00:08:41,909 --> 00:08:39,200
it's just interesting though it's the

226
00:08:44,470 --> 00:08:41,919
main focus is where is he getting those

227
00:08:46,790 --> 00:08:44,480
you know that paragraph about

228
00:08:48,389 --> 00:08:46,800
meteors and solar flares that's really

229
00:08:49,590 --> 00:08:48,399
what we want to know what we want to

230
00:08:51,190 --> 00:08:49,600
know

231
00:08:53,030 --> 00:08:51,200
and once again

232
00:08:56,070 --> 00:08:53,040
i don't know if i said this if you've

233
00:08:58,470 --> 00:08:56,080
seen he is julian barnes is a national

234
00:09:00,550 --> 00:08:58,480
security reporter based in washington

235
00:09:03,670 --> 00:09:00,560
washington covering the intelligence

236
00:09:04,870 --> 00:09:03,680
agencies so he has sources and

237
00:09:06,790 --> 00:09:04,880
you know i don't know if he's trying to

238
00:09:09,030 --> 00:09:06,800
make his sources happy by throwing in

239
00:09:10,949 --> 00:09:09,040
that line about meteors and

240
00:09:13,190 --> 00:09:10,959
solar flares he may have sources that

241
00:09:15,509 --> 00:09:13,200
think ufos are nonsense and that's why

242
00:09:16,470 --> 00:09:15,519
that was in there i don't know

243
00:09:18,150 --> 00:09:16,480
um

244
00:09:19,750 --> 00:09:18,160
but

245
00:09:23,350 --> 00:09:19,760
he's not the guy to read if you want to

246
00:09:26,790 --> 00:09:23,360
read about ufos from an unbiased

247
00:09:29,350 --> 00:09:26,800
standpoint in my opinion

248
00:09:31,829 --> 00:09:29,360
the work that kane

249
00:09:33,110 --> 00:09:31,839
blumenthal and cooper have have done in

250
00:09:34,630 --> 00:09:33,120
the past

251
00:09:37,190 --> 00:09:34,640
as far as the new york times that

252
00:09:39,190 --> 00:09:37,200
they've done some great work and julian

253
00:09:40,790 --> 00:09:39,200
barnes seems more like the

254
00:09:44,790 --> 00:09:40,800
the um

255
00:09:48,949 --> 00:09:47,030
more traditional reporter covering this

256
00:09:50,790 --> 00:09:48,959
subject more of what we would have

257
00:09:53,670 --> 00:09:50,800
it's more of what we would expect from

258
00:09:55,350 --> 00:09:53,680
before 2017. um

259
00:09:57,030 --> 00:09:55,360
those articles are still out there

260
00:09:58,949 --> 00:09:57,040
they're becoming few and far between and

261
00:10:00,550 --> 00:09:58,959
i'm not saying skepticism should not be

262
00:10:02,630 --> 00:10:00,560
in articles but

263
00:10:05,750 --> 00:10:02,640
meteors and solar flares are not

264
00:10:08,310 --> 00:10:05,760
skepticism that's just plain utter

265
00:10:10,230 --> 00:10:08,320
bs and we all know it so

266
00:10:11,590 --> 00:10:10,240
all right so that's that update and i

267
00:10:13,670 --> 00:10:11,600
will do something this week i don't know

268
00:10:16,470 --> 00:10:13,680
yet i don't know what i will be doing

269
00:10:18,550 --> 00:10:16,480
yet but i do want to at some point

270
00:10:19,750 --> 00:10:18,560
get into poltergeists and how it affects

271
00:10:21,430 --> 00:10:19,760
uh

272
00:10:23,670 --> 00:10:21,440
the whole idea of what we're dealing

273
00:10:25,350 --> 00:10:23,680
with and how it connects to ufos because

274
00:10:26,550 --> 00:10:25,360
i think the connection is really

275
00:10:29,590 --> 00:10:26,560
important

276
00:10:32,150 --> 00:10:29,600
um and it was it was a big part of osap

277
00:10:33,990 --> 00:10:32,160
which studied ufos and related phenomena

278
00:10:36,069 --> 00:10:34,000
so

279
00:10:38,150 --> 00:10:36,079
i think there is a clue there as to what

280
00:10:40,310 --> 00:10:38,160
we're dealing with and it to me it does

281
00:10:41,670 --> 00:10:40,320
not point towards extraterrestrials at

282
00:10:42,630 --> 00:10:41,680
least

283
00:10:44,790 --> 00:10:42,640
not

284
00:10:47,910 --> 00:10:44,800
along those lines there still could be

285
00:10:49,509 --> 00:10:47,920
et's here i don't know i mean

286
00:10:50,870 --> 00:10:49,519
somebody told me that was part of the

287
00:10:52,230 --> 00:10:50,880
equation

288
00:10:53,750 --> 00:10:52,240
and it wasn't somebody who works in

289
00:10:56,310 --> 00:10:53,760
intel but it was somebody who has a lot

290
00:10:57,829 --> 00:10:56,320
of great contacts and basically they

291
00:10:59,949 --> 00:10:57,839
were saying

292
00:11:03,350 --> 00:10:59,959
it's a lot of things including

293
00:11:07,190 --> 00:11:05,269
can't prove any of that it's just one

294
00:11:09,590 --> 00:11:07,200
person telling me that

295
00:11:12,069 --> 00:11:09,600
and yeah time travel was mentioned inner

296
00:11:13,509 --> 00:11:12,079
dimensionals all that stuff

297
00:11:15,110 --> 00:11:13,519
so

298
00:11:16,710 --> 00:11:15,120
we still don't know

299
00:11:22,870 --> 00:11:16,720
and

300
00:11:23,990 --> 00:11:22,880
incoherently i'm going to end it so yeah

301
00:11:26,150 --> 00:11:24,000
just

302
00:11:27,750 --> 00:11:26,160
thanks for listening everybody and um

303
00:11:28,630 --> 00:11:27,760
like i said try to join twitter if you

304
00:11:32,870 --> 00:11:28,640
can

305
00:11:34,630 --> 00:11:32,880
it's at the ufojo11

306
00:11:36,069 --> 00:11:34,640
where is it

307
00:11:40,310 --> 00:11:36,079
that's my

308
00:11:43,190 --> 00:11:40,320
and

309
00:11:44,550 --> 00:11:43,200
if you guys support this i try to do

310
00:11:47,190 --> 00:11:44,560
this

311
00:11:48,870 --> 00:11:47,200
all day every day um

312
00:11:50,470 --> 00:11:48,880
i have a part-time job which i am not

313
00:11:52,710 --> 00:11:50,480
working until

314
00:11:54,550 --> 00:11:52,720
mid mid-december

315
00:11:56,949 --> 00:11:54,560
i work at caesar's palace working the

316
00:12:00,310 --> 00:11:56,959
concerts on one of the camera operators

317
00:12:02,710 --> 00:12:00,320
and usher is up next i'm a big sting fan

318
00:12:04,470 --> 00:12:02,720
which i just did just finished

319
00:12:05,750 --> 00:12:04,480
i'm not a big usher fan but i watch the

320
00:12:07,350 --> 00:12:05,760
videos online

321
00:12:08,710 --> 00:12:07,360
not my kind of music but it seems like a

322
00:12:10,790 --> 00:12:08,720
great show so i'll probably have fun but

323
00:12:13,350 --> 00:12:10,800
that's only a couple of weeks so

324
00:12:16,069 --> 00:12:13,360
any support you can offer here is great

325
00:12:17,509 --> 00:12:16,079
i know some people can't offer anything

326
00:12:20,949 --> 00:12:17,519
i understand

327
00:12:22,790 --> 00:12:20,959
and um those are the three places where

328
00:12:24,470 --> 00:12:22,800
people who want to support this you can

329
00:12:26,470 --> 00:12:24,480
go and

330
00:12:28,550 --> 00:12:26,480
patreon is

331
00:12:31,990 --> 00:12:28,560
is always there that's monthly the other

332
00:12:35,430 --> 00:12:32,000
ones are one time anyway all right